![pianoteq sound vs. acoustic pianoteq sound vs. acoustic](https://d29rinwu2hi5i3.cloudfront.net/article_media/7986fdd0-7785-4cf5-9296-402cfaca3027/mod_insts_fig_1.jpg)
- #Pianoteq sound vs. acoustic skin
- #Pianoteq sound vs. acoustic software
- #Pianoteq sound vs. acoustic tv
MIDI CC64 messages are about sustaining samples. that resonates with me too (sorry for pun), i have two 8" active monitors lodged inside my old converted upright piano at keyboard height (embedded mother) and the vibrations are a welcome addition to the playing experience.Vagfilm I have the impression that the only feature in which Pianoteq excels is in the pedalling and how unforgiving you can set the pedal (ie, some VSTs are very forgiving and don't mud the notes, even if you overpedal). Reminds me that I had to use foam earplugs recently when I went to see Blade Runner 2049 in a theater where the sound system is deafeningly loud! Got rid of the screechy mids and highs, but the subbass when through unaltered.
#Pianoteq sound vs. acoustic skin
It's true that subbass is not stopped by earphones (or ear plugs) and goes in through your skin almost. AND while the powered subwoofer is also on! (Of course the effect would not work for solo piccolo music, but it really works well with orchestral music, music with piano, and especially with large pipe organs.) Drives my wife nuts, but this visceral feeling is a very satisfying musical experience!Īh! Ah!.Nice one, almost too cruel to be true Much to the dismay of my wife, I enjoy listening to commercial recordings of all types of music through my headphones.
#Pianoteq sound vs. acoustic tv
add a really good sound system and picture seems better or add a better tv and the sound seems better. Sorta like when you get a good tv and picture looks good. it does add to a more real feel and "psychologically" makes it sound better. I played with speakers off through headphones and then speakers on still with headphones. with my Casios with the built in speakers. I never noticed the feel of the vibrations until a couple years ago when someone mentioned it. That's why I think the best way to play a virtual piano is using headphones, the only way to bypass the speakers. In a playing condition, things are more difficult, because of the speakers effect. Just play and enjoy music.įinally, the only way to compare side by side is to hear and compare recorded music from the 2 technologies through the same speakers/headphones.
![pianoteq sound vs. acoustic pianoteq sound vs. acoustic](https://www.soundskool.asia/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/1.jpg)
#Pianoteq sound vs. acoustic software
There is no real point of comparison.īut for those who play virtual instruments, we must accept to have a good sounding digital piano or software as a reasonably good solution to play (record) music if we can not have the real one. Since no acoustic piano is played through speakers nor heapdphones, I think we can definitely not compare an acoustic with a virtual piano. In one side you have strings and sounding boards, on the other side you have speakers or headphones. I Think it is impossible because even if you could create/reproduce the same sound and feel, there will always be a big difference in the diffusion of the sound. So, how can you make comparisons between an electronic instrument and the instrument it models, without having access to the original instrument, recorded and reproduced by the same equipment and in the same acoustic environment as the electronic studio?